

Molecular Entomology, 2024, Vol. 15, No. 5 doi: 10.5376/me.2024.15.0023
Received: 07 Sep., 2024 Accepted: 08 Oct., 2024 Published: 20 Oct., 2024
Fu G.L., 2024, Genetic insights into sitophilus oryzae: implications for pest management in rice, Molecular Entomology, 15(5): 192-199 (doi: 10.5376/me.2024.15.0023)
This study explores the genetic basis of Aspergillus oryzae, utilizing advances in genomics and molecular biology to understand its biological and evolutionary adaptability, revealing insights into genes related to resistance, reproduction, and survival as targets for innovative pest management strategies. It emphasizes the integration of genetic tools such as RNA interference (RNAi) and gene editing techniques into existing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) frameworks, as well as case studies demonstrating the practical application of these tools in different regions. The study discusses challenges, including ethical considerations, regulatory barriers, and the need for public participation, and highlights the importance of international cooperation and strong policy-making. This study aims to emphasize the potential of genetic insights to revolutionize pest management and contribute to sustainable agriculture and global food security.
1 Introduction
Sitophilus oryzae, commonly known as the rice weevil, is a significant pest affecting stored grains worldwide, particularly rice (Zhang et al., 2023). This beetle is notorious for causing extensive damage to cereal crops both in the field and during storage, rendering grains unsuitable for consumption and export (Hu et al., 2018; Parisot et al., 2021). The rice weevil's ability to infest and damage stored grains makes it a major concern for food security and economic stability in regions dependent on rice as a staple food (Pal et al., 2021). Its widespread presence and adaptability have made it a persistent challenge for agricultural sectors globally (Thangaraj et al., 2016; Suhriani et al., 2023).
Managing infestations of S. oryzae presents several challenges. The primary method of control has been the use of chemical fumigants like phosphine; however, the indiscriminate and prolonged use of such chemicals has led to the development of resistance in weevil populations (Selvapandian et al., 2023). Genetic studies have revealed low mitochondrial diversity in S. oryzae, which may be linked to repeated fumigation practices that eliminate less common haplotypes, complicating resistance management strategies (Thangaraj et al., 2019). Additionally, resistance to other insecticides, such as deltamethrin, has been documented, further complicating control efforts (Singh et al., 2021). The genetic variability and adaptability of S. oryzae across different geographic regions also pose significant hurdles in implementing uniform pest management strategies (Fahad et al., 2018).
By sequencing the genome and analyzing genetic markers, this study revealed the molecular basis of resistance and adaptability in Aspergillus oryzae, explored the interaction between hosts and symbionts, and explored the role of transposons in the elephant beetle genome. This may provide new approaches for pest control strategies, promote the development of more effective and sustainable pest management practices, reduce dependence on chemical fumigants, and alleviate the economic impact of rice blast disease on rice production. This study aims to provide comprehensive genetic insights into S. oryzae, focusing on its genome structure, genetic diversity, and resistance mechanisms.
2 Genetic Insights into Sitophilus oryzae
2.1 Genomic studies and their findings
Recent genomic studies on Sitophilus oryzae have provided significant insights into its genetic makeup, revealing a genome rich in Transposable Elements (TEs), which constitute about 72% of its genome (Figure 1) (Parisot et al., 2021). This high percentage of TEs is associated with the insect's endosymbiotic state and has implications for its adaptability and evolution. The genome sequencing efforts have also highlighted a high gene expansion rate in S. oryzae compared to other beetles, which may contribute to its success as a pest. Additionally, the genetic diversity of S. oryzae has been studied across different geographic locations, showing low mitochondrial diversity typical of stored product pests, which may be influenced by repeated phosphine fumigations.
Figure 1 A Proportion of repeat content in S. oryzae’s genome (Adopted from Parisot et al., 2021) Image caption: The majority of repeats detected in S. oryzae are represented by Class II (TIR) elements, LINEs (Class I), and unclassified repeats (unknown). NR: non repetitive. B Variation of genome size and TE content in 62 insect species and S. oryzae. Coleopteran species are depicted in dark blue, and S. oryzae in light blue. S. oryzae is clearly a TE-rich genome. C TE proportion across 11 insect species, including six coleoptera. PLEs are included in the LINE superfamilies, DIRS in LTRs, and RC, CRY, MAV and TIR in the DNA superfamilies. NR: non repetitive. S. oryzae harbors the largest TE content among Coleopterans and most insect species studied to date. Within Coleoptera, there is a large variation in TE content and type, with A. planipennis, L. decemlineata, and O. taurus carrying an abundant LINE content, while S. oryzae, T. castaneum, and A. glabripennis show larger DNA content. D Classification of the 570 Mbs of TEs present in the S. oryzae genome. Most TIR families detected were not classified into known superfamilies. RTE LINE and Gypsy LTR elements are the most abundant superfamilies among retrotransposons. Around 21% of repeats in S. oryzae’s genome were not classified by our pipeline, and remain unknown (gray). E Distribution of TIR length sequences (right) detected by einverted and the internal region present between both TIRs (left) for complete consensus of TIR superfamilies (color) and unknown TIR families (gray) (Adopted from Parisot et al., 2021) |
2.2 Advances in molecular biology techniques
Advancements in molecular biology techniques have facilitated the development of species-specific microsatellite markers for S. oryzae, aiding in the assessment of population structuring and genetic differentiation across various regions (Thangaraj et al., 2016). Techniques such as RNA-seq have been employed to study phosphine resistance mechanisms, identifying differential expression of mitochondrial and detoxification genes in resistant populations (Selvapandian et al., 2023). Furthermore, the identification of specific mutations, such as the T929I mutation conferring resistance to deltamethrin, underscores the role of molecular techniques in understanding and managing insecticide resistance (Singh et al., 2021).
2.3 Evolutionary implications of genetic adaptations
The genetic adaptations observed in S. oryzae have significant evolutionary implications. The extensive presence of TEs and the high gene expansion rate suggest a dynamic genome capable of rapid adaptation, which is crucial for survival in diverse environments and under various pest management strategies. The lack of phylogeographic structuring and significant gene flow across regions, as observed in India, indicates that S. oryzae populations are not isolated, which may facilitate the spread of advantageous genetic traits, such as resistance to phosphine and other insecticides (Thangaraj et al., 2019). These genetic insights are critical for developing effective pest management strategies and understanding the evolutionary trajectory of S. oryzae as a major agricultural pest.
3 Implications for Pest Management
3.1 Molecular-targeted pest control strategies
The genetic insights into Sitophilus oryzae offer promising avenues for molecular-targeted pest control strategies. The identification of specific genetic markers, such as the super kdr mutation T929I, which confers resistance to deltamethrin, highlights the potential for developing targeted interventions that can mitigate resistance issues (Singh et al., 2021). Additionally, the discovery of various Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) genes that are up-regulated in response to phosphine exposure suggests that targeting these detoxification pathways could enhance the efficacy of existing fumigants (Holloway et al., 2016). The use of microsatellite markers to assess population structuring can also inform targeted control measures by identifying genetically distinct populations that may require different management approaches.
3.2 Integrating genetic tools with existing IPM frameworks
Integrating genetic tools with existing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) frameworks can enhance the effectiveness of pest control strategies for S. oryzae. The development of species-specific microsatellite markers provides a valuable resource for monitoring genetic diversity and population dynamics, which is crucial for implementing effective IPM strategies (Thangaraj et al., 2016). Furthermore, understanding the genetic basis of phosphine resistance through transcriptome profiling can aid in the design of more precise and sustainable pest management practices (Selvapandian et al., 2023). By incorporating genetic insights into IPM, it is possible to develop more adaptive and resilient pest control strategies that can respond to the evolving resistance patterns of S. oryzae.
3.3 Potential risks and ethical considerations
While genetic insights offer significant potential for improving pest management, they also raise potential risks and ethical considerations. The manipulation of genetic pathways, such as those involved in resistance mechanisms, could inadvertently affect non-target species or lead to unforeseen ecological consequences (Parisot et al., 2021). Additionally, the use of genetic data in pest management must be carefully regulated to prevent misuse or unintended impacts on biodiversity. Ethical considerations also include the need for transparency and stakeholder engagement in the development and implementation of genetically informed pest control strategies. It is crucial to balance the benefits of genetic interventions with the potential risks to ensure sustainable and responsible pest management practices.
4 Genetic Approaches in a Real-World Context
4.1 Background and regional relevance
The rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae, is a significant pest affecting stored grains globally, with particular prevalence in regions such as India, Australia, China, and the USA. Understanding the genetic diversity and population structure of S. oryzae is crucial for developing effective pest management strategies (Rojasara and Patel, 2020). Studies have shown that genetic diversity in S. oryzae is relatively low, which is typical for stored product pests, possibly due to repeated fumigations that eliminate low-frequency haplotypes (Thangaraj et al., 2019). In India, for instance, the genetic diversity is higher compared to other countries, indicating a need for country-wide management strategies due to significant gene flow across regions.
4.2 Implementation of genetic tools
Genetic tools such as microsatellite markers and transcriptome profiling have been employed to study the population structure and resistance mechanisms in S. oryzae. Microsatellite markers have been developed to assess population structuring, revealing high levels of genetic differentiation among populations from different countries (Thangaraj et al., 2016). Additionally, transcriptome profiling has identified genes associated with phosphine resistance, such as the up-regulation of the dld gene and antioxidant enzymes in resistant populations. These genetic insights are crucial for tailoring pest management strategies to specific regional challenges.
4.3 Outcomes and lessons learned
The application of genetic tools has provided valuable insights into the population dynamics and resistance mechanisms of S. oryzae (Li, 2024). The identification of distinct genetic clusters and resistance-associated genes has highlighted the need for targeted pest management strategies that consider regional genetic variability. Moreover, the discovery of specific mutations conferring resistance to insecticides like deltamethrin underscores the importance of monitoring genetic changes to adapt management practices accordingly (Singh et al., 2021). These findings emphasize the necessity of integrating genetic data into pest management programs to enhance their effectiveness and sustainability.
5 Challenges and Future Directions
5.1 Barriers to widespread adoption of genetic strategies
The adoption of genetic strategies for pest management in Sitophilus oryzae faces several challenges. One significant barrier is the development of resistance to genetic control methods, such as the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT), which requires extensive resources for mass rearing and sterilization of insects (Häcker et al., 2023). Additionally, the genetic diversity and geographic structure of S. oryzae populations, as seen in India, complicate the implementation of uniform genetic strategies across different regions (Thangaraj et al., 2019). The presence of genetic resistance to commonly used insecticides, such as phosphine and deltamethrin, further complicates the integration of genetic approaches with existing pest management practices.
5.2 Innovations in genetic pest management
Recent innovations in genetic pest management include the development of transgenic, symbiont-mediated, and gene-drive strategies, which offer new solutions for controlling pest populations. The sequencing of the S. oryzae genome has provided insights into the genetic makeup of this pest, revealing potential targets for genetic interventions (Mgonja et al., 2016). Additionally, the identification of specific genetic mutations, such as the T929I mutation conferring resistance to deltamethrin, highlights the potential for using molecular markers in resistance management and the development of targeted genetic control methods (Singh et al., 2021).
5.3 Long-term sustainability of genetic approaches
The long-term sustainability of genetic approaches in pest management depends on overcoming resistance and ensuring ecological safety (Chen and Zhang, 2024). The high gene expansion rate and transposable element activity in S. oryzae suggest a dynamic genome that may adapt quickly to genetic interventions, posing a challenge to the sustainability of these methods. Furthermore, the potential for unintended ecological impacts necessitates careful assessment and monitoring of genetic control strategies to ensure they do not adversely affect non-target species or ecosystems. Continued research into the genetic and metabolic mechanisms underlying resistance, such as those observed in phosphine-resistant strains, is crucial for developing sustainable and effective genetic pest management strategies (Kim et al., 2019).
6 Case Studies in Action
6.1 RNAi technology in Sub-Saharan Africa
RNA interference (RNAi) technology has emerged as a promising tool for pest management, particularly in regions like Sub-Saharan Africa where traditional pest control methods face challenges. The genetic insights into Sitophilus oryzae, such as the identification of resistance mechanisms to phosphine and deltamethrin, provide a foundation for developing RNAi-based strategies (Machuca-Mesa et al., 2024). For instance, targeting specific genes responsible for resistance, like the Dihydrolipoamide Dehydrogenase (DLD) gene linked to phosphine resistance, could enhance the effectiveness of RNAi interventions (Figure 2) (Selvapandian et al., 2023). This approach could potentially reduce reliance on chemical fumigants and mitigate resistance development in pest populations.
Figure 2 Docked complex of phosphine into susceptible DLD protein (Adopted from Selvapandian et al., 2023) Image caption: A) Full structural view of the docked complex. DLD protein is represented as a ribbon model, FAD as ball, and stick model with heteroatom coloring (oxygen in red, nitrogen in blue, hydrogen in white, ferrous in orange, and carbon in gold) and phosphine as a stick model. B) Interaction view of the docked complex. Interacting amino acid is represented as stick model with backbone carbon atoms in light gray. C) Surface view of binding pocket with FAD and phosphine molecules (Adopted from Selvapandian et al., 2023) |
6.2 Genetically resistant rice varieties in South Asia
In South Asia, the development of genetically resistant rice varieties has been a key strategy in managing Sitophilus oryzae infestations (Nguyen et al., 2019). Research has shown that certain rice genotypes exhibit varying levels of resistance to pest infestations, which can be attributed to their genetic makeup (Ajao et al., 2020). For example, interspecific rice genotypes derived from Oryza sativa and Oryza barthii have demonstrated resistance to both Sitophilus oryzae and Rhyzopertha dominica, highlighting the potential of breeding programs to enhance pest resistance. These efforts are crucial in regions where pest pressure is high and chemical control options are limited.
6.3 Regional collaboration in Southeast Asia
Regional collaboration in Southeast Asia has been instrumental in addressing the challenges posed by Sitophilus oryzae. Countries like China and Vietnam have reported high levels of phosphine resistance, necessitating a coordinated approach to pest management (Nguyen et al., 2016). The conservation of genetic resistance mechanisms across different strains of S. oryzae in these countries underscores the importance of sharing knowledge and resources to develop effective management strategies. Collaborative efforts can facilitate the exchange of resistant rice varieties and integrated pest management practices, ultimately enhancing food security in the region.
7 Global Policy and Collaboration in Pest Management
7.1 International collaboration for pest genomics research
International collaboration is crucial in advancing pest genomics research, particularly for pests like Sitophilus oryzae, which have significant impacts on global agriculture. Collaborative efforts can facilitate the sharing of genomic data and resources, which are essential for understanding the genetic makeup and resistance mechanisms of pests. For instance, the sequencing of the S. oryzae genome has been a collaborative effort that provides insights into its transposable elements and symbiotic relationships, which are vital for developing targeted pest management strategies. Such collaborations can also help in standardizing methodologies and tools across different regions, enhancing the effectiveness of pest management programs globally.
7.2 Regulatory frameworks for genetic pest management tools
The development and implementation of genetic pest management tools require robust regulatory frameworks to ensure safety and efficacy. Regulatory bodies must consider the genetic diversity and resistance patterns of pests like S. oryzae, which have shown significant genetic variability and resistance to common insecticides like phosphine and deltamethrin (Ajao et al., 2020; Rajarushi et al., 2024). These frameworks should facilitate the approval and monitoring of new genetic technologies, such as gene editing and transgenic approaches, while ensuring they do not adversely affect non-target species or ecosystems. International guidelines and harmonization of regulations can support the deployment of these tools across borders, addressing the global nature of pest challenges (Syanizam et al., 2024).
7.3 Public engagement and education
Public engagement and education are critical components of successful pest management strategies. Educating stakeholders, including farmers, policymakers, and the general public, about the genetic aspects of pest management can foster acceptance and informed decision-making. For example, understanding the genetic basis of resistance in S. oryzae can help in promoting the adoption of integrated pest management practices that reduce reliance on chemical controls (Nguyen et al., 2015; Fahad et al., 2018). Public awareness campaigns can also highlight the benefits and safety of genetic pest management tools, addressing potential concerns and misconceptions. Engaging communities in the development and implementation of pest management strategies can enhance their effectiveness and sustainability.
8 Concluding Remarks
The research on Sitophilus oryzae has unveiled significant genetic insights that are crucial for pest management strategies. The genome of S. oryzae is notably rich in transposable elements, which constitute 72% of its genome, indicating a high rate of gene expansion compared to other beetles. This genetic makeup, along with the endosymbiotic relationship with Sodalis pierantonius, highlights the complexity of its biology and its adaptability as a pest. Additionally, studies have shown that S. oryzae exhibits low genetic diversity in certain regions, such as India, which may be linked to repeated phosphine fumigations. Resistance to common insecticides like deltamethrin and phosphine has been identified, with specific genetic mutations such as T929I contributing to this resistance. The development of microsatellite markers has furthered our understanding of the population structure and genetic differentiation among S. oryzae populations globally.
Future research should focus on exploring the functional roles of transposable elements in S. oryzae and their impact on pest adaptability and resistance mechanisms. There is also a need to investigate alternative pest control strategies that do not rely solely on chemical fumigants, given the rising resistance to phosphine and deltamethrin. Developing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies that incorporate genetic insights, such as the use of resistant rice varieties like Lalka Basmati and Bahuguni-2, could be beneficial. Policymakers should consider implementing region-specific pest management plans that account for the genetic diversity and resistance profiles of local S. oryzae populations.
The genetic insights into Sitophilus oryzae provide a foundation for developing more effective pest management strategies. By leveraging genomic data and understanding the genetic basis of resistance, researchers and policymakers can devise targeted interventions to mitigate the impact of this pest on rice production. Continued research and collaboration across disciplines will be essential to address the challenges posed by S. oryzae and ensure sustainable agricultural practices.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Mr. Xu for critically reading the manuscript and providing valuable feedback that improved the clarity of the text.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
The author affirms that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ajao S., Popoola K., Mande S., and Togola A., 2020, Resistance levels of selected rice genotypes to Sitophilus oryzae L. and Rhyzopertha dominica F. infestations, Zoologist, 17: 39-46.
https://doi.org/10.4314/tzool.v17i1.7
Chen R.C., and Zhang Q.F., 2024, Pesticide usage in rice cultivation: consequences for soil and water health, Molecular Soil Biology, 15(3): 118-128.
https://doi.org/10.5376/msb.2024.15.0013
Fahad S., Butt M., Iqbal A., Shaheen N., Shah S., Hassan S., and Khan I., 2018, Analyzing the genetic variability of rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptra; Curculionidae) in different geographic locations of district Charsadda 2018, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Pakistan, Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 6: 1117-1121.
Häcker I., Bartsch D., Choo A., and Marec F., 2023, Editorial: genetic control of insect pest species-achievements, challenges, and perspectives, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11: 1208677.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1208677
Holloway J., Falk M., Emery R., Collins P., and Nayak M., 2016, Resistance to phosphine in Sitophilus oryzae in Australia: a national analysis of trends and frequencies over time and geographical spread, Journal of Stored Products Research, 69: 129-137.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSPR.2016.07.004
Hu F., Ye K., Tu X., Lu Y., Thakur K., Jiang L., and Wei Z., 2018, Identification and expression profiles of twenty-six glutathione S-transferase genes from rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 120: 1063-1071.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.185
Kim K., Yang J., Sung J., Lee J., Park J., Lee H., Lee B., Ren Y., Lee D., and Lee S., 2019, Minimization of energy transduction confers resistance to phosphine in the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae, Scientific Reports, 9(1): 14605.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50972-w
Li J.Q., 2024, Role of proteomics in unraveling bacterial virulence in rice, Computational Molecular Biology, 14(1): 36-44.
https://doi.org/10.5376/cmb.2024.14.0005
Machuca-Mesa L.M., Turchen L.M., and Guedes R.N.C., 2024, Phosphine resistance among stored product insect pests: a global meta-analysis-based perspective, Journal of Pest Science, 97(3): 1485-1498.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01713-6
Mgonja E., Balimponya E., Kang H., Bellizzi M., Park C., Li Y., Mabagala R., Sneller C., Correll J., Opiyo S., Talbot N., Mitchell T., and Wang G., 2016, Genome-wide association mapping of rice resistance genes against Magnaporthe oryzae Isolates from four African countries, Phytopathology, 106(11): 1359-1365.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-16-0028-R
Nguyen C., Verdeprado H., Zita D., Sanada‐Morimura S., Matsumura M., Virk P., Brar D., Horgan F., Yasui H., and Fujita D., 2019, The development and characterization of near-isogenic and pyramided lines carrying resistance genes to brown planthopper with the genetic background of japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.), Plants, 8(11): 498.
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8110498
Nguyen T., Collins P., and Ebert P., 2015, Inheritance and characterization of strong resistance to phosphine in Sitophilus oryzae (L.), PLoS One, 10(4): e0124335.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124335
Nguyen T., Collins P., Duong T., Schlipalius D., and Ebert P., 2016, Genetic conservation of phosphine resistance in the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (L.), The Journal of Heredity, 107(3): 228-237.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esw001
Pal M., Tiwari S., Regmi R., and Ali F., 2021, Varietal screening of rice genotypes for the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus) (Curculionidae: Coleoptera) at laboratory condition, Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 22: 51-60.
https://doi.org/10.3126/aej.v22i0.46785
Parisot N., Vargas-Chávez C., Goubert C., Baa-Puyoulet P., Balmand S., Beranger L., Blanc C., Bonnamour A., Boulesteix M., Burlet N., Calevro F., Callaerts P., Chancy T., Charles H., Colella S., Da Silva Barbosa A., Dell’Aglio E., Di Genova A., Febvay G., Gabaldón T., Ferrarini G., Gerber A., Gillet B., Hubley R., Hughes S., Jacquin‐Joly E., Maire J., Marcet-Houben M., Masson F., Meslin C., Montagné N., Moya A., De Vasconcelos A., Richard G., Rosen J., Sagot M., Smit A., Storer J., Vincent-Monégat C., Vallier A., Vigneron A., Zaidman-Rémy A., Zamoum W., Vieira C., Rebollo R., Latorre A., and Heddi A., 2021a, The transposable element-rich genome of the cereal pest Sitophilus oryzae, BMC Biology, 19: 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01158-2
Rajarushi C.N., Nebapure S.M., Biswas A., Rajna S., and Subramanian S., 2024, Contact toxicity of insecticides against rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. and its effect on progeny production, Scientific Reports, 14(1): 28404.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80157-z
Rojasara A., and Patel D., 2020, Varietal resistance against Sitophilus oryzae in rice, Indian Journal of Entomology, 82: 72-74.
https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2020.00018.8
Selvapandian U., Nallusamy S., Singh S., Mannu J., Shanmugam V., Ravikumar C., and Subbarayalu M., 2023, Transcriptome profiling and in silico docking analysis of phosphine resistance in rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Journal of Insect Science, 23(6): 29.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iead110
Singh S., Jagadeesan R., Thangaraj S., Selvapandian U., Nayak M., and Subbarayalu M., 2021, Phenotypic and molecular analyses in rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linneaus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): identification of a super kdr mutation, T929I conferring resistance to deltamethrin, Pest Management Science, 77(7): 3289-3299.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6373
Suhriani S., Panhwar W., and Shaikh A., 2023, Studies on the morphology and molecular characterization of stored grain weevils sitophilus (Curculionidae: Coleoptera) from Khairpur, Sindh-Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology, 20(2): 258-268.
https://doi.org/10.34016/pjbt.2023.20.02.819
Syanizam N.N., Bakhori S.K.M., and Hamzah S.N., 2024, The susceptibility of malaysian rice brands to Sitophilus oryzae and the potential application of zinc oxide nanoparticles for control purposes, Malaysian Applied Biology, 53(4): 153-158.
https://doi.org/10.55230/mabjournal.v53i4.3054
Thangaraj S., McCulloch G., Subbarayalu M., Subramaniam C., and Walter G., 2016, Development of microsatellite markers and a preliminary assessment of population structuring in the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.), Journal of Stored Products Research, 66: 12-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSPR.2015.12.005
Thangaraj S., McCulloch G., Subtharishi S., Chandel R., Debnath S., Subramaniam C., Walter G., and Subbarayalu M., 2019, Genetic diversity and its geographic structure in Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera; Curculionidae) across India-implications for managing phosphine resistance, Journal of Stored Products Research, 84: 101512.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.101512
Zhang T., Hu Q., Wang J., Chen L., Zhang Y., Shen M., and Cao Y. 2023, The rice cultivar affects the population growth and physiological enzyme activity of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) reared on rice grains, Journal of Stored Products Research, 104: 102163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2023.102163
. PDF(818KB)
. FPDF(win)
. FPDF(mac)
. HTML
. Online fPDF
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Guanli Fu

Related articles
. Sitophilus oryzae

. Genetic pest management

. RNA interference (RNAi)

. Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

. Sustainable agriculture

Tools
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment